Unknown Wood

Name
Unknown /Wood/
Marriage
Note: Never actually married.

Never actually married.

Not entirely sure about this. Agatha seems to have had a Close son in tow in 1872. He was born at Mallerstang and died in Burnley in the same year that she married John Markham. It's possible that he was John's son, but given the strange name it's equally possible that he belongs to someone else. For the time being we're assuming a different father.

Birth of a son
Note: Illegitimate. Father unknown, but his mother had a habit of using the father's surname as a Christian name.
Baptism of a son
Death of a son
Death of a wife
Family with Agatha Park Close
himself
wife
1861 Census
1847–1898
Birth: 1847 — Keighley, Yorkshire, England
Death: 1898 — Burnley, Lancashire, England
Marriage Marriage — after 1871 —
2 years
son
Birth Index
1872–1872
Birth: 1872 — Mallerstang, Kirkby Stephen, Westmorland, England
Death: after 12 May 1872 — Burnley, Lancashire, England
John Markham + Agatha Park Close
wife’s husband
1881 Census
1844–
Birth: about 1844 — Stanton, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
wife
1861 Census
1847–1898
Birth: 1847 — Keighley, Yorkshire, England
Death: 1898 — Burnley, Lancashire, England
Marriage Marriage — 1872 — Burnley, Lancashire, England
3 years
stepson
1881 Census
1874–
Birth: 1874 — Burnley, Lancashire, England
8 years
stepdaughter
1881–1888
Birth: 1881 — Burnley, Lancashire, England
Death: 1888 — Burnley, Lancashire, England
2 years
stepdaughter
1891 Census (page 1)
1882–
Birth: 1882 — Burnley, Lancashire, England
William Taylor + Agatha Park Close
wife’s husband
1891 Census (page 1)
1857–
Birth: about 1857 — Shoreditch, London, Middlesex, England
wife
1861 Census
1847–1898
Birth: 1847 — Keighley, Yorkshire, England
Death: 1898 — Burnley, Lancashire, England
Marriage Marriage — after 1883 —
Marriage

Never actually married.

Not entirely sure about this. Agatha seems to have had a Close son in tow in 1872. He was born at Mallerstang and died in Burnley in the same year that she married John Markham. It's possible that he was John's son, but given the strange name it's equally possible that he belongs to someone else. For the time being we're assuming a different father.